By Krista Kvinsland
Relationships
between people aren’t what they used to be. With the increase in technology and
mainly social media, in-person relationships have been drastically affected.
The average American spends just under 7 hours a day on their phones, and a
majority of that time is spent on social media. Curating posts, checking feeds,
and doomscrolling have become normal parts of that day. One side of the
argument believes that social media is bringing people closer together than
ever before. With accessibility to people hundreds of miles away at the touch
of a button, that ideology is true. People are able to connect, no matter the
time zone. Yet the other side argues that this access to social media has
slowly been drawing a divide between people and those relationships. People
need to be careful when juggling social media as well as their relationships
with people, because it is very challenging to keep the balance between the
two.
Perspective
#1: Social Media is a Great Tool for Relationships:
On the positive end of the argument,
social media does help bring people closer together. Couples are able to
connect and keep in touch, even when not together. In her article, “10 Positive
Effects of Social Media on Relationships,” Barbara Ivusic argues that social
media has helped couples communicate and connect better than ever. Without easy
ways to communicate, many people would feel alone and left out of their
partner's life. Ivusic states how important communication is for couples, and
how social media has amplified it. Ivusik also examines how social media is a
great place to find out more about a partner’s interests. Partners can learn of
the others interests through things they like, share, and send. Meeting people
on social media is also a common way that people meet their partners, and
Ivusic makes that point clear. She says, “There is no shortage of apps that are
centered on making connections.” She also states that social media has found a
way into the lives of the elderly, looking to make connections as well. Once
these connections are made, using social media as a tool to organize hanging
out and meeting up is also a function it serves. There are many ways that
social media can be used to improve the lives of those in relationships. The
possibilities are endless when it comes to ideas and connections made with just
the touch of a button.
Perspective
#2: Social Media is Bad for Relationships:
Although couples can see social
media as a tool to help strengthen and better their relationships, there are
also a lot of downsides. In her article, “12 Ways Social Media Affects
Relationships, From Research & Experts,” Abby Moore argues that couples
need to lessen their time spent on social media to better their relationship.
Moore explains how social media makes people in relationships have unrealistic
expectations of each other and also themselves. Many posts online highlight
only the good parts of relationships, like elaborate vacations, date nights,
and even proposals. This can damage the stability and happiness of couples if
their relationship doesn’t mirror those expectations. She also highlights how
social media can be linked to massive amounts of jealousy. Scrolling through
partners’ following or stalking exes can lead to jealousy and insecurities
between partners. She also warns that this jealousy can cause trust issues
within relationships. Moore also uses statistics to show how the overuse of social
media can make couples want to fight more. The main negative impact that social
media has on those in relationships is taking time away from each other. Moore
explains how internet addictions are making people less likely to engage in
deep and meaningful conversation and time with their partners. They are finding
pleasure in scrolling on their phones, and that pleasure can’t be matched with
a real human connection. Social media has also been found to have drastic
effects on mental health. Moore scrutinizes its negative effect on the mental
health of users and how it has been linked to issues like poor self-esteem and
depression. Moore also references its association with body image problems.
Edited images and unrealistic expectations for how people should look cause
real damage. She lastly states how self-centered and narcissistic social media
makes people. The need to post pictures and receive feedback can make people
have an ego. People in relationships should not be self-centered, and Moore
emphasizes how it can lead to trauma for the partner. While social media can be
utilized for good, it is also a slippery slope into the bad parts. It’s hard
for couples not to compare their relationship to those online and deepen their
connection, when scrolling and avoiding real things is so much easier.
Points of Disagreement:
Each argument portrays social media in opposite ways. While one praises it for bringing people closer together, one breaks it down for tearing people apart. One of the things they disagree on the most is the effect social media has on relationships. In her article, Ivusic claims that social media has made bonds stronger between people. She references how posting big news and accomplishments to their feed will make people reach out. She says, “Sharing important life events like births and marriages on your social media allows others to take an interest in your life's journey.” Ivusic also uses long-distance relationships as an example of how social media can bring people closer together. Even though they cannot be in the same place, they can still share a meaningful bond and connection. On the contrary, Moore believes quite the opposite. She claims that social media “distracts” people from spending real time with people. She uses an article from the National Library of Medicine explaining the dangers of people’s internet addiction. Moore explains that, “Constant scrolling through social media can cause you to be less engaged or excited in your relationship.” Connecting with people in real life is hard, which is why people have resorted to the connection they feel through their phones. If people feel like their real life isn’t interesting, they don’t have any reason to put real effort into anything. Both articles and authors have strong points in convincing readers that social media has different effects on users.
Points of Agreement:
While
both authors disagree about social media’s influence and effect on
relationships, they both agree that communication is important. Whether that be
in support of the utilization of social media or not, each side recognizes that
key part. In her article, Ivusic mentions how easy couples reach each other
with access to social media. She exemplifies this by saying that
“[c]ommunicating through chats, messages, and calls is a quick and easy way to
stay in touch.” There are so many different platforms that encourage
communication, which makes it easier for partners, even when they can’t be
together. It has also made people feel more optimistic about being able to go
long distances effectively. People don’t feel discouraged about living apart
from their partner, because they are able to text, call, or even FaceTime them
any time they want. Moore agrees that spending quality time with partners leads
to strong and healthy relationships. She emphasizes how addictions to
technology and social media keep people from spending that time with each
other. Moore advises, “Practice valuing in-person connection over internet
connection.” She phrases the importance of connection, while also pointing out
how social media is harming that. Although they disagree on the ways couples
can connect, both authors find communication vitally important. Moor and Ivusic
make clear references to the connection between partners and how those things
can be accomplished.
Strengths
and Weaknesses of Source #1:
Ivusic presents a strong argument
supporting her claim that social media has a place in people’s relationships,
but there are also some spots she could’ve done a better job supporting it. She
is a staff writer at MUO and has worked there for over 15 years. Ivusic
specializes in online and print publishing and received a Bachelor's in English
from the University of Sydney. She highlights key points that help structure
her argument and has valid reasons supporting each section. She does not cite
any articles written by people who study the effects of social media on those
in relationships, which could have strengthened her argument. Similarly, her
use of logic and reasoning was not as effective as she could’ve made it.
Without including links to other articles or statistics to help prove her
point, it’s hard to reason with her claim. Ivusic’s argument relies heavily on
relating to her audience and using personal emotions to persuade them. The
pictures she includes in her article display happy couples, and people are
drawn in. In her argument for each point, she uses scenarios that many would
relate to in order to come off trustworthy.
Strengths
and Weaknesses of Source #2:
Moore displays her information
differently, using a more reasonable approach to her argument. Abby Moore is an
editorial operations manager for Mindbodygreen and received a bachelor's in journalism from the University of Texas at Austin. She covers many topics in her
work and does not specialize in just one field. In her article, she references
the National Library of Medicine and the Australian Journal of Information
Systems, which boost her credibility throughout her article. Both of these
websites show thorough knowledge of the topic and are peer-written and
reviewed. Utilizing these articles makes her more trustworthy to readers
because she connects her claim to reputable sources in these areas. She links many of her points to other articles that explain
in a deeper context. Including these helps her reasoning in her article because
there is evidence to support the points she is making. Her argument does not use
as much pathos and emotional appeal as Ivusic’s, though. Her article lacks
pictures to grab the reader’s attention or trigger words to evoke emotion.
Moore used a more reasonable approach that did not rely as heavily on the
emotional appeal to the reader.
Compromise:
Both sides of the argument bring up
relevant and convincing points. Although there is sufficient evidence to
support the argument for both sides, there is no winner. Relationships are so
unique and specific to each situation that there can’t be a clear side to pick.
Understanding the benefits and drawbacks of social media helps users make more
conscious decisions about using it. There needs to be a healthy balance between
phone usage and time spent deliberately to ensure the strength and stability of
a relationship. There will be instances where having alone time from each other
on separate social media will happen, but it also needs to be thought about how
that may be affecting the relationship. With each relationship and the dynamic
of it being different, people need to consider both sides and make the best
decision for themselves.
Hi Krista,
ReplyDeleteI really liked reading your post. I was instantly drawn to your post just by the introduction, as someone who uses social media, I was able to really connect with this topic and enjoyed your writing. This was a very insightful post!
This was an interesting topic, I like that the compromise mentions that human connections/relationships are indeed complex and cannot be determined through only online connection or only in person connection.
ReplyDelete